Kerrville Folk Festival
Infrastructure and Improvement Planning Process

Introduction

             KFF has several major improvements that are – or should be – in the planning stages.  (1) Funds have been committed to double the size and improve the Threadgill viewing area.  (2) Strong interest exists in building a new staff shower/bathroom building to replace the rotting wood structure that exists today.  (3) Planning is under way to do grading to improve drainage and reduce erosion on the ranch.  (4) In addition, there has been discussion that the festival should plan to build permanent housing (“condo row”) somewhere on the hillside behind the stage area.  (4) And last, for now, there has been discussion about whether the festival should permit, or encourage, the leveling of ground in the hillier areas of the ranch to make camping more comfortable.

            There are many “stake holder” individuals and groups that are a part of the festival that have a keen interest in land use, infrastructure, and improvements.  We need a more formalized process in place to socialize needs and ideas, seek input, gather consensus, and make recommendations for board approval that are as broad based as possible.  One goal of such a process is to let folks who have opinions have an avenue to express them in the planning stage rather than complaining after the building is done.  Another is to rally support for the various projects – volunteer labor and money.  And most importantly, we have some great talent amongst our festival family, and we may find some very creative ideas/solutions through this process that we wouldn’t have thought of before.  And most importantly, to have as much consensus as possible so that when it comes time for KFF or QVR to approve projects, we have a thoroughly vetted proposal to submit for approval.

            Project management process as approved by the KFF Board.

            Step one is a “request for proposals” – RFP for each major project that we are seeking input on.  We will post the initial discussion for each project.  This is a discussion paper as to the needs, considerations/conflicts, etc. and may present a solution or plan.  That at least paints a target for others to shoot at.  This “RFP” would have a submission deadline.  These “RFPs” would also seek interest – to identify those who have something to contribute to the project, such as planning, building, financing, etc. 

            Each project would require that some individual be responsible for driving the planning process for that project – the project manager.  There may, either initially or at some point in the project, be a project team, with additional individuals appointed to assist and advise the project manager.  The project manager/team would create a report based on the RFP submissions.  This report would summarize and evaluate the various RFP submissions.  This report would be posted for comment on the web page.  This report should be a stage in narrowing the ideas/proposals down to one or more options and identify decision points that festival management/Board should look at.  The project manager would be expected to communicate with the authors of the various submissions to seek additional input, to address concerns about their proposal in order to give the proposers a chance to tweak, improve or abandon their ideas.

            After the comment cycle on the project management report, the project manager would decide if anything in the comments pointed to needed changes in the report.  A revised report would then be submitted to festival management and the Board for further consideration.  The Board would then be expected to approve a “concept” – a very high level plan to go forward on.

            The next step after approval of a “concept” would be creation of detailed plans.  This would include a “floor plan” which shows the construction details (and may include elevations or other drawings as necessary for a contractor to bid and build the project).  Also included would be a “site plan” that shows the location of the structure on the ranch, and the necessary utilities, drainage, access roads, etc necessary to make the project fit in its environment.  A “site plan” would not include landscaping details, but a landscaping plan could be included if deemed necessary.

 

Learn More About and Comment on Current Projects: